publichouse.sg

Tools
A+ R A- wide normal
Login
  • Skip to content
publichouse.sg » Home » Categories » Politics » A calculated move to discredit WP & Png: Low TK
  • Subscribe RSS
  • HomeOverview of publichouse.sg
  • About UsOverview of publichouse.sg
  • Categoriesoverview
    • Community
    • Focus
    • Editorial
    • Music
    • Top Story
    • Football
    • Sex Matters
    • Events
    • What Others Say
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • People
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Alternative Life Stuff
    • Finance/Business
    • Entertainment
    • Foreign Desk
  • Store 
  • contactwith us
Tuesday, 22 May 2012 23:19

A calculated move to discredit WP & Png: Low TK

  • Written by  Andrew Loh
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • E-mail
  • 7 comments
Tweet
Low Thia Khiang Low Thia Khiang

On Tuesday, a visibly upset Mr Low Thia Khiang, secretary general of the Workers’ Party (WP), made an impassioned defence of the accusations against the WP’s Hougang by-election candidate, Png Eng Huat.

Mr Low, speaking from a rain-soaked stage, explained how Png Eng Huat’s name had ended up on the ballot paper of the WP selection of NCMP meeting last year. Mr Low said he still listed the names of the whole East Coast GRC team in the ballot paper because they were all part of the team. Png was part of the East Coast team at last year’s General Election. “Personal preferences had to be set aside. The selection of the NCMP lies solely with the CEC,” Mr Low explained.

Mr Low’s defence comes after questions were raised – both by the PAP and online after a copy of the minutes of that NCMP selection meeting was leaked. Mr Low confirmed that the copy circulating online was indeed the minutes of that selection process.

Here is Mr Low’s speech in full. Transcripts are below:

Dear voters of Hougang and supporters,

Good evening.

This Hougang by-election is full of surprises. Let me now explain NCMP selection of the Workers’ Party and put it in perspective.

Png Eng Huat’s statement to the CNA (Channelnewsasia), during the interview, said that he took his name out of the ballot. He was not referring to the ballot paper but the ballot, as in the voting process, and running for the NCMP position.

I had anticipated that there could be differences of opinion about how NCMP seats should be fielded.

Hence, in Jan 2010, after Parliament passed the amendments to the Constitution to increase the NCMP seats from 3 to 9, the CEC passed a resolution to set up the process of NCMP selection via secret voting.

I had prepared the ballot paper for the Extraordinary Meeting. [Holds up ballot paper] This is the ballot which I prepared, with all the names of the team on the ballot paper.

Png Eng HUat had told me before and after the General Election that he was strongly against the NCMP scheme and did not want to be considered for the NCMP position. Just as Eric Tan had told me of his desire to be NCMP.

However, I still listed the names of the whole East Coast GRC team because they were all part of the team. Personal preferences had to be set aside. The selection of the NCMP lies solely with the CEC.

Therefore, whether a candidate wanted personally to be an NCMP or not, the decision is not his. It would be the collective decision of the CEC. This is how, I believe, a collective leadership should function in a political party.

I confirm that the minutes circulating over the Internet and published by the papers is the minutes of the Workers’ Party on the selection of the NCMPs. I do not want to speculate how the anonymous source obtained the minutes. However, this is obviously a calculated move made at this point of time to intentionally damage the Workers’ Party and sabotage the Workers’ Party candidate in Hougang.

But this is a weak attempt at discrediting the Workers’ Party.

In fact, I would invite all of you to take a look at the minutes. It shows that the Workers’ Party functions in a fair and transparent manner, where decisions are made collectively. In addition, it also dispels rumours that the CEC is made up of “yes-men” and “women”, or fully controlled by Low Thia Khiang.

In this case the CEC was not unanimous in its decision.

Png Eng Huat had previously stated his stand against the NCMP position to me and some other members of the CEC but he still got one vote. The majority voted for Gerald Giam. When the voting result was concluded, only Eric Tan decided to resign. The other CEC members stayed united and on course with the Workers’ Party. This shows that the Workers’ Party, as a credible party, can embrace different opinions while working together as a team, and moving forward.

I urge the voters in Hougang to focus on the by-election and not to be distracted by the issue.

I stand by what I said when I introduced Png Eng Huat to you last Saturday. Png Eng Huat is a man of integrity.

Vote for Png Eng Huat!

 

Join publichouse.sg on Facebook:


If you like this article, please consider a small donation to keep publichouse.sg running. Our contributors and we thank you for your generosity.



Published in Politics
Social sharing
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to MySpace
  • Add to Technorati
Andrew Loh

Andrew Loh

Andrew's passion are social and political issues. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. Andrew also writes weekly for Yahoo Singapore which nominated him as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011 and cited him for having "pioneered a new form of journalism in Singapore - the kind that dared to speak truth to power."

Latest from Andrew Loh

  • When activists cross the line
  • Cartoonist's arrest - not just about alleged sedition
  • A lone voice no more
  • Cheering bigotry in the House
  • Allow society to be provoked
More in this category: « What next for "The Independents"? The politics of the Scholar in White »

7 comments

  • Comment Link andy yap Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:46 posted by andy yap

    irwan.......you mean your whole block head!

  • Comment Link lim Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:21 posted by lim

    @irwan

    i don't get your logic... if say PAP wins this election, and then Hougang SMC gets merged into AMK GRC, would you say that there are some members in the GRC team who would get 'a free ticket into parliament'? so would you spoil your vote?

    either way, PEH is not getting a free ticket into parliament... he is fighting for it (of course with the help of the other members of his party)...

  • Comment Link A.C. Wednesday, 23 May 2012 00:27 posted by A.C.

    @ low see pang. png still got one vote even though he had prior told most cec members (but not all) that he would not want to be an NCMP. So if I am one of the voting cec members, I will then not waste my vote on png even if I think he's the candidate of my choice and will vote for another. I suppose that's probably why png ended up with one vote.

    @irwan. If you could share more, i am curious to know how you come to know that your whole blk will not vote for png? I am wondering if you have conducted a poll with every single unit in that block?

  • Comment Link Singaporean Wednesday, 23 May 2012 00:00 posted by Singaporean

    is Desmond choo is the best man in pap .

  • Comment Link fightfortherightsingaporean Tuesday, 22 May 2012 23:59 posted by fightfortherightsingaporean

    my hougang sector HDB will votE WP HUAT AR

  • Comment Link Low See Pang Tuesday, 22 May 2012 23:57 posted by Low See Pang

    I'm confused.
    By confirming that Png was in the ballot paper for NCMP, LTK is confirming that Png got only 1 vote from CEC, and therefore confirming that Png is not deemed as the best man by the CEC. Yet, LTK now expects hougang voters to send Png to parliament??!!!!??!!?!!!! WTF!!!??!!!

  • Comment Link irwan Tuesday, 22 May 2012 23:34 posted by irwan

    hi andrew, my whole blk is not voting for png for simple reasons.

    1. we dont need someone who wants a free ticket to parliament
    2. we need an mp who serve us not our voice in parliament

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Learn more about our commenting policy(clicking on this link will open up another window)

back to top

Recent Articles

  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
    AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has indicated that it has…
    1 comment Read more...
  • When activists cross the line
    When activists cross the line By Andrew Loh In recent years, there have been instances…
    8 comments Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Our Sponsors

Categories

  • Focus (14)
  • Hindsight (0)
  • Columnists (0)
  • Editorials (29)
  • Music (23)
  • Sex Matters (26)
  • Odd Man !n (6)
  • Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
  • Events (33)
  • Public TV (0)
  • Picture House (0)
  • What Others Say (38)
  • Top Story (16)
  • Politics (191)
  • Economy (6)
  • People (35)
  • Health (4)
  • Environment (6)
  • Alternative Life Stuff (9)
  • Community (384)
  • Finance/Business (11)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Foreign Desk (8)
  • Subscribe RSS
publichouse.sg © 2011. All rights reserved.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?