publichouse.sg

Tools
A+ R A- wide normal
Login
  • Skip to content
publichouse.sg » Home » Categories » Top Story » Community » Undercover politicians and civil servants
  • Subscribe RSS
  • HomeOverview of publichouse.sg
  • About UsOverview of publichouse.sg
  • Categoriesoverview
    • Community
    • Focus
    • Editorial
    • Music
    • Top Story
    • Football
    • Sex Matters
    • Events
    • What Others Say
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • People
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Alternative Life Stuff
    • Finance/Business
    • Entertainment
    • Foreign Desk
  • Store 
  • contactwith us
Wednesday, 27 June 2012 12:49

Undercover politicians and civil servants

  • Written by  Administrator
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • E-mail
  • 1 Comment
Tweet
Undercover politicians and civil servants

By Tang Li

One of my favourite shows on TV is “Undercover Boss.” The premise of the show is wonderfully simple. It gets a boss from a big corporation to go undercover and work as one of the ordinary workers. At the end of the show the workers are summoned to the company's headquarters, where the big boss announces improvements and implements a few suggestions the workers have made for the benefit of the company.

There are two magic ingredients to this show. The first is the realisation on the bosses part of the realities on the ground. For example, it’s funny to see how bosses of hotel chains get the shock of their lives when they discover what the housecleaning department in a hotel actually does.The other touching element is discovering how many ideas the ordinary workers have for improving their own working environment.

Every time I’ve watched this show, I wondered how things would be like if public servants had to go undercover for a week or two and worked as ordinary people. While there are a lot of things going right about the way things are done in Singapore, there is inevitably more that can be done or be improved.

Singapore has undoubtedly benefited from being open to the free movement of people and ideas. We have been very successful at studying business and social models from around the world and adapting them to Singapore. We have been very good at buying and using technology from elsewhere.

What we have been less good at is developing anything of our own. I think of an inventor I know who proposed a solution for one of our key needs to a government agency. He was told, “Nobody else in the world has done it the way you are proposing.” His private retort was, “Nobody else is in the unique situation that we are in.”

He’s right. Singapore is a unique place with its own set of issues or at least unique variations of common issues. The solutions are not as obvious and you can no longer rely on someone else to come up with the solutions for you.

As such, anyone who is in the business of creating public policy needs to be open to as many ideas as possible. Yes, it’s important to be open to the world. It is equally as important to listen to the ground. After all, the policies created in Singapore will affect the people living there rather than elsewhere. So, where do we get these “local” ideas from?

It’s been pointed out that the government does provide feedback channels. There is also the Meet the People Sessions, where Members of Parliament meet ordinary folk.

Unfortunately, people have a way of hiding things when it comes to dealing with those in authority. Let’s face it, many of us won’t tell our bosses everything, let alone to a minister.

Think of the number of times schools and army camps have put on a show for visiting dignitaries.

I suspect the solution may be to create a compulsory “undercover” week for senior public servants. This should be a period for them to go down to the ground as "ordinary people". This will allow them to stay in touch with and understand how their policies affect the ground and create better policies for the future. This will require hard work and financial resources may be expanded. However, it would be a worthwhile investment in helping the governed and the governing classes understand each other better.

-----------------

Join publichouse.sg on Facebook:


If you like this article, please consider a small donation to keep publichouse.sg running. Our contributors and we thank you for your generosity.



Published in Community
Tagged under
  • Tang Li
Social sharing
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to MySpace
  • Add to Technorati
Administrator

Administrator

Latest from Administrator

  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
  • More than a picnic, less than a conspiracy
  • Silence over Sri Lanka’s killing fields
  • Single-identity politics
  • Nizam Ismail saga – the good, the bad and the ugly

Related items (by tag)

  • What do we base our laws on?
  • God's work
  • Where's the big deal?
More in this category: « Rental hike broke them at the knees STOMP - stamp out bad practices »

1 Comment

  • Comment Link 60sperson Wednesday, 27 June 2012 15:02 posted by 60sperson

    your undercover idea is excellent. however, i'm not sure you're correct in saying MPs and ministers are not Told about problems. the pap grassroots workers i know express frustration that the concerns they bring up are ignored.

    that shanmugam was unaware of the issues blogger gintai brought up in their one on one conversation was astonishing. these have been issues for some Years now. they are now being felt very badly because they have been ignored for so long.

    many issues today boil down to the lack of infrastructural preparation for the large influx of foreigners allowed in here. to expect to be able to carry on with what you have - trains, homes, hospitals - despite adding 2.8million pple More (includes 1m tourists a mth) in barely 20 years, is totally absurd. where is the planning and foresight that is boasted about?

    one would also have to be rather stupid not to realise there would also be Huge social consequences when you introduce extremely large numbers of people into a society in a very short time. it doesn't look as if this even a consideration.

    you do not need undercover work to realise these Basics. feedback should only expose the Extent of the impact and resultant problems arising from the very poor decisions, not the existence of these problems. that these devts would cause problems is a given.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Learn more about our commenting policy(clicking on this link will open up another window)

back to top

Recent Articles

  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
    AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has indicated that it has…
    Be the first to comment! Read more...
  • When activists cross the line
    When activists cross the line By Andrew Loh In recent years, there have been instances…
    8 comments Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Our Sponsors

Categories

  • Focus (14)
  • Hindsight (0)
  • Columnists (0)
  • Editorials (29)
  • Music (23)
  • Sex Matters (26)
  • Odd Man !n (6)
  • Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
  • Events (33)
  • Public TV (0)
  • Picture House (0)
  • What Others Say (38)
  • Top Story (16)
  • Politics (191)
  • Economy (6)
  • People (35)
  • Health (4)
  • Environment (6)
  • Alternative Life Stuff (9)
  • Community (384)
  • Finance/Business (11)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Foreign Desk (8)
  • Subscribe RSS
publichouse.sg © 2011. All rights reserved.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?